"Pics or it didn't happen" is over. Generative AI can fake any clip, so the new standard is IRL. Play Evidence Court: real, generated, or can't tell from video alone?">
Ch. 3 · Signal lost · Tracking adjusted
For a hundred years, a recording was the end of the argument. Now anyone can generate a convincing clip of anything in minutes. Video isn't proof anymore. It's a rumor with good lighting.
Eight clips. For each one, decide: real, generated, or video alone can't tell me. Read the clues. Scoring rewards good judgment, not lucky guesses. Every clip is fictional and described in words; no real people appear.
REC ● 00:00:11
Court adjourned
Notice the pattern: the clips you could trust weren't the ones that looked most real. They were the ones with something besides the clip: other angles, other people, a paper trail. In other words, the real world.
Photos could be doctored for a century, but it took skill and time. Video was the last holdout. Now a teenager with a laptop can make a clip that would have fooled a newsroom in 2015.
That cuts both ways. Fakes can be passed off as real. And real things can be waved away as fake by anyone who doesn't like them. When anything could be generated, everything can be denied.
So the standard shifts back to something very old: people who were there, records that agree with each other, and the patience to check.
This is general media-literacy advice, not legal or forensic guidance. Related: what happens when a crowd skips these steps.
Three designs for the post-video era. Vote for the one you'd actually wear. Nothing is charged; this tells us what to make.
More cheeky goods at the Scallywag shop: scallywag-media.com.
Exhibits examined: 0 of 0
Chain-of-custody clearance. You examined every exhibit in person, which, these days, is the only kind of examining that counts.
New rounds of Evidence Court, merch drops, and other satire and commentary from Scallywag Media. Sent by humans. Probably.